Shift Briefing Series: Police response to suicidal subjects

Feed from PoliceOne. Discuss any topic you like here.
Forum Information
You will earn 1.5 pts. per new post (reply) in this forum.

**Registered members may reply to any topic in this forum**
User avatar

Topic Author
NHGF [Feed]

FeedBot
Posts: 16128
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 pm
Contact:
Status: Offline

Posting Badges

#1

Post by NHGF [Feed] » Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:34 pm

The Shift Briefing Series is designed to provide law enforcement officers with short training videos that will help make them smarter, safer and more efficient in daily operations and when responding to critical incidents. The videos address key components of the Top 20 Concepts, a class I created and have presented around the country since 2011. The class addresses 20 foundational concepts in law enforcement that are based in law, policy and ethics, are repeatable and defensible, and assist with critical incident decision-making. Group discussion questions are listed after each video to help solidify the topics and ensure the application is in line with your department’s mission and values. This video discusses one of the most difficult and emotional calls law enforcement handles today. It will address if law enforcement should assist on armed suicidal subject calls (SSC), if there is a time to walk away and the legal justification for using force on a non-criminal SSC. The Safety Priorities, Graham v. Connor (the balance of the governmental interest vs. the persons protection from improper seizure), and the locations where the subject will likely be contacted (open air, vehicles and the home) will be used to answer many questions about SSC. While not every aspect is covered, this video will help viewers reason through decisions made on these challenging calls. QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
  • How are the Safety Priorities integrated into your department’s decision-making, policies, tactics and procedures? Can you explain how the Safety Priorities might shape the tactics you will use to approach a suicidal subject? What does Graham v. Connor require us to balance against the government’s interest? How does a suicidal subject’s location influence the balance between governmental interest and the subject’s right to privacy and protection from seizure? Since a search warrant is unlikely to be issued in the absence of a crime, what are the ways law enforcement can legally justify their entry into a private residence in order to aid a suicidal subject? Are there times where it is appropriate for law enforcement to disengage from the suicidal subject and leave the scene? If law enforcement leaves the scene, what should they do next to help ensure the innocent public is safe?
Next Shift Briefing: How to carry a downed officer or hurt citizen



  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post