Internal ATF Document Reveals Standards For Administrative Actions RE: FFL’s
Forum Information
You will earn 1.5 pts. per new post (reply) in this forum.
**Registered members may reply to any topic in this forum**
You will earn 1.5 pts. per new post (reply) in this forum.
**Registered members may reply to any topic in this forum**
-
- Posts: 17274
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:16 pm
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Opinion
Internal ATF Document Reveals Standards For Administrative Actions RE: FFL'sWashington, DC –-(Ammoland.com)- Gun Owners of American have supplied an unreleased ATF document entitled “Federal Firearms Administrative Action Policy and Procedure” to AmmoLand News for review. The document (embedded below) provides ATF inspectors with guidelines for “administrative remedies” for violations found during an inspection of a federal firearms licensees (FFLs). These rules went into effect on February 21st of 2017. The rules will run to February 21st of 2022. The document outlines the minimum guidelines for the ATF inspectors. It doesn't cover every scenario that the inspectors might find at the FFL location, but the field offices should try to stay to the order as much as possible. If the document doesn't cover a scenario, then the appropriate action for a violation is left up to the field division's Director of Industry Operations (DIO). The document defines administrative actions as a warning letter, area supervisor warning conference, DIO warning conference, revocation of the FFL, or a fine and suspension of the FFL. The document makes clear that a “Report of Violation” is not an administrative action. It defines it as a “documentation of inspection findings.” When the ATF agent finds a violation, the document states that the agent must consider the following questions even when the offense appears willful:

- Is the FFL willing/able to achieve and maintain voluntary compliance?
- Will the continued operation of the FFL, pose a threat to public safety or contribute to violent or other criminal activities?
- Is the FFL taking responsibility for violations and willing to work with ATF to correct them?
- Does the FFL understand the importance of firearms traceability and GCA records in protecting the public and reducing violent crime?
- Do violations have a nexus to persons prohibited from possessing firearms?